Our first goal is to give an almost complete description of Dehn functions of finitely presented groups in terms of time functions of Turing machines. First of all Birget and Sapir [38] proved that every Dehn function is the time function of a nondeterministic Turing machine.
This result restricts the class of functions which can be Dehn functions of groups. Indeed, time functions of non-deterministic machines are functions f(n) which can be computed deterministically in time at most 2f(n). It is easy to construct a recursive number such that the function is not computable even in double exponential time by a Turing machine, so is not equivalent to the Dehn function of any finitely presented group. This answers a question by Gersten (he asked if every increasing recursive function >n2 is equivalent to the Dehn function of a finitely presented group).
The set of Dehn functions ``must" satisfy a yet another restriction: every Dehn function ``must" be superadditive (more precisely, it ``must" be equivalent to a superadditive function), that is for every m,n. We put the word ``must" in quotation marks because the proof of this restriction is yet to exist. Here is a quasi-proof. Notice that it is enough to show that for some constant c and all m,n (since we identify equivalent functions). Now, if the word w of length has area f(m) and the word w' of length has area f(n) and there are no cancellations in the product wgw' where g is a word of small length (), then this product ``cannot" have area smaller than f(m)+f(m). Since the length of wgw' is , we have . Figure 2 shows a diagram with boundary label wgw'.
Of course the problem is that we can probably tessellate the disk with the boundary label wgw' in a different, more economical, way. Still there are so many ways to choose g, and to connect two van Kampen diagrams that it seems unlikely that we cannot find a product wgw' with area f(m)+f(n).
Although, as we have said the proof of superadditivity conjecture does not exist at that time, Guba and Sapir were able to prove the following partial result.
The proof of this theorem basically shows that the idea presented above works in the case of free products.
In view of Theorem 4, the superadditivity conjecture is equivalent to the following property:
The Dehn function of any finitely presented group G is equivalent to the Dehn function of the free product .
The next theorem gives a description of Dehn functions. It shows that the class of functions f(n) > n4 satisfying the restrictions mentioned above virtually coincides with the class of Dehn functions >n4 of finitely presented groups.
Moreover, G(M) simulates M, that is there exists an injective map K from the set of input words of M to such that
This theorem implies the following description of the ``isoperimetric spectrum" in , that is the numbers such that is equivalent to a Dehn function of a finitely presented group.
We say that a real number is computable in time for some function T(m) if there exists a deterministic Turing machine which for every number m, written in binary, computes a binary fraction approximating with error not exceeding time at most T(m).
Of course all well known numbers >4 (say, rational numbers, for integers a, b, a>4b), are computable in polynomial time, so for these numbers , is the Dehn function of a finitely presented group. For , Brady and Bridson proved that the spectrum contains all numbers of the form where a > b are integers, so the spectrum is dense in the set of all real numbers, but a description similar to Theorem 6 is not known for numbers . Even for non-integer rational numbers between 2 and 4 we do not yet know if they belong to the isoperimetric spectrum. We expect the result for to be similar to Theorem 6.
Of course Theorem 5 provides examples of Dehn functions which are much more complicated than . For example, functions like are clearly equivalent to fourth powers of time functions of Turing machines (hint: take the Turing machines which calculates the fourth root of such a function in the unary notation), and by Theorem 5 they are equivalent to Dehn functions of finitely presented groups.
Theorem 2 allows us to formulate the following corollary of Theorem 5 which gives examples of subgroups of the direct product of two free groups with ``arbitrary weird" distortion.
Recall that is automatic. Notice that every cyclic subgroup of it is (obviously) quasi-isometrically embedded.